The Effect of Perceived Favoritism and Absence of Punishment on Employee Productivity Decline at GraPARI Telkomsel Mataram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/jmm.v15i2.873Keywords:
Perceived Favoritism, Absence of Punishment, Employee Productivity DeclineAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of perceived favoritism and absence of punishment on employee productivity decline at GraPARI Telkomsel Mataram. Employee productivity is a critical factor in determining organizational performance, particularly in service-based industries where employee behavior directly influences service quality and customer satisfaction. However, internal organizational factors such as perceived unfairness and weak disciplinary enforcement may contribute to productivity decline. This research uses a quantitative causal approach with a census sampling technique involving 50 employees as respondents. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The validity, reliability, and classical assumption tests were conducted to ensure the robustness of the model. The results of the partial analysis indicate that perceived favoritism has no significant effect on employee productivity decline. In contrast, absence of punishment has a positive and significant effect on employee productivity decline. These findings suggest that weak disciplinary enforcement is a more dominant factor influencing productivity decline compared to perceived favoritism. Therefore, strengthening organizational discipline systems is essential to maintain employee productivity in service organizations.References
Ali, M., Lodhi, S. A., & Raza, B. (2021). Impact of organizational justice on employee productivity: Mediating role of job satisfaction. Heliyon, 7(8), e07779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07779.
Anwar, K., & Abdullah, N. N. (2021). The impact of human resource management practices on organizational performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211003570.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Colquitt, J. A., & Zipay, K. P. (2015). Justice, fairness, and employee reactions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology, 2, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111457.
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1767–1797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316684192.
De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., & Azeem, M. U. (2019). Unfairness and employee performance. Journal of Business Research, 95, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.024.
Elnaga, A., & Imran, A. (2019). The effect of training on employee performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n5p1.
Fischer, T., & Sitkin, S. B. (2020). The dark side of organizational justice. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0055.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25. Universitas Diponegoro.
Gould-Williams, J. (2019). HR practices and employee performance. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1428419.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice framework. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bumi Aksara.
Hassan, S., & Wright, B. E. (2020). Organizational justice and employee outcomes. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13112.
Kim, S. (2020). Public service motivation and performance. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19834459.
Lau, V. P., Tong, C., Lien, B. Y., & Hsu, B. C. (2019). Emotional intelligence and employee performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2353.
Mahmood, A., et al. (2022). Workplace discipline and productivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845233.
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2006). Human resource management. Thomson South-Western.
Nguyen, H., & Ngo, T. (2021). Leadership fairness and employee behavior. Management Decision, 59(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2020-0888.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2020). Common method bias in behavioral research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology, 7, 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045301.
Rasool, S. F., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., & Samma, M. (2020). Sustainable workplace environment and employee performance. Sustainability, 12(16), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166428.
Ribeiro, N., et al. (2020). Authentic leadership and performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2019-0268.
Sedarmayanti. (2018). Sumber daya manusia dan produktivitas kerja. Mandar Maju.
Shkoler, O., & Tziner, A. (2020). Work motivation and productivity. Current Psychology, 39, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00511-0.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Treviño, L. K. (1992). Ethical decision-making in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 17(4), 647–676.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putu Windrawan, Harry Kurniawan, Ary Rangga Rezki, Rohman Rofiki

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY 4.0. This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in JMM.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).




